{"id":14,"date":"2017-01-09T14:37:40","date_gmt":"2017-01-09T14:37:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/test.radical-openness.org\/2017\/?page_id=14"},"modified":"2017-06-06T08:37:10","modified_gmt":"2017-06-06T06:37:10","slug":"methodologies","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/research.radical-openness.org\/2017\/en\/methodologies\/","title":{"rendered":"Matters & Methods"},"content":{"rendered":"

Matter & Methods <\/span>ist ein eklektisch angelegtes Projekt. Wir befragen ausgew\u00e4hlte Protagonist_innen, die sich mit ihrer Arbeit in den Feldern Kunst, Wissenschaft und Aktivismus bewegen. \u00dcber pers\u00f6nliche Motivationen, angewandte Methoden, Werkzeuge und Taktiken untersuchen wir,<\/span> welche Schnittmengen es methodisch darin gibt. Wie die Methoden, das Methodenwissen und der methodische Weg \u2013 zwischen Theorie und Praxis \u2013 beschrieben werden.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Wir gehen von der Grundlage aus, dass Wissenschaft und Kunst eigene Methoden haben. Es geht nicht um einen direkten Vergleich oder um Wertigkeiten in diesem Zusammenhang (Vgl. Weibel Peter, The Unreasonable\u2026. <\/span>1<\/sup><\/a>)<\/i><\/span>. Im Fokus unseres Interesses steht, wie sich wissenschaftliche, aktivistische und k\u00fcnstlerische Zug\u00e4nge aus der Sicht der Protagonist_innen ineinanderf\u00fcgen und wie sie ihre Arbeit als Beitrag zu zeitgen\u00f6ssischen gesellschaftlichen Entwicklungen einsch\u00e4tzen. <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Peter Weibel: \u201eKunst und Wissenschaft k\u00f6nnen nur vern\u00fcnftig verglichen werden, wenn wir akzeptieren, dass beide Methoden sind. Das bedeutet nicht, dass wir erkl\u00e4ren, dass beide dieselben Methoden besitzen. Wir wollen nur erkl\u00e4ren, dass beide eine methodische Ann\u00e4herung haben, selbst wenn ihre Methoden verschieden sind oder sein k\u00f6nnen.\u201c<\/i><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

————————————– en———————————————————-<\/p>\n

Matters & Methods<\/span> is an eclectically designed project. We question selected protagonists, who move with their work in the fields of art, science, and activism. On the basis of personal motivations, applied methods, tools, and tactics, we investigate methodological intersections and how the methods, the method knowledge, and the methodological path \u2013 between theory and practice \u2013 can be described.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

We start from the foundation that science and art have their own methods. The point is not to make a direct comparison or <\/span>to <\/span>make value judgments in this context <\/span>(<\/span>cf<\/span>. Weibel Peter, The Unreasonable\u2026. <\/span>1<\/sup><\/a>)<\/i><\/span>. <\/span>Our interest focuses on how scientific, activist, and artistic approaches fit together from the perspective of the protagonists, and how they see their work as a contribution to contemporary social developments.<\/span> <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Peter Weibel: \u201c<\/i><\/span>Art and science can only reasonably be compared if we accept that both are methods. This does not mean that we declare that both have the same methods. We only want to declare that both have a methodological approach, even if their methods are or can be different.\u201d<\/i><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

1 <\/a>Peter Weibel, \u201cThe Unreasonable Effectiveness of the Methodological Convergence of Art and Science\u201d, in: Christa Sommerer\/Laurent Mignonneau (<\/i><\/span><\/span><\/span>Eds<\/i><\/span><\/span><\/span>.), Art @ Science, <\/i><\/span><\/span><\/span>Vienna<\/i><\/span><\/span><\/span>\/New York 1998, <\/i><\/span><\/span><\/span>p<\/i><\/span><\/span><\/span>. 170.<\/i><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Matter & Methods ist ein eklektisch angelegtes Projekt. Wir befragen ausgew\u00e4hlte Protagonist_innen, die sich mit ihrer Arbeit in den Feldern Kunst, Wissenschaft und Aktivismus bewegen. \u00dcber pers\u00f6nliche Motivationen, angewandte Methoden, Werkzeuge und Taktiken untersuchen wir, welche Schnittmengen es methodisch darin gibt. Wie die Methoden, das Methodenwissen und der methodische Weg \u2013 zwischen Theorie und Praxis […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"class_list":["post-14","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/research.radical-openness.org\/2017\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/14","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/research.radical-openness.org\/2017\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/research.radical-openness.org\/2017\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/research.radical-openness.org\/2017\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/research.radical-openness.org\/2017\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/research.radical-openness.org\/2017\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/14\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":126,"href":"https:\/\/research.radical-openness.org\/2017\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/14\/revisions\/126"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/research.radical-openness.org\/2017\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}